Monday, December 22, 2003

There's another interesting conversation going on over at Dean's place in regard to the Homeland Security alert levels. Dean likes 'em. Many don't.

Something that was briefly addressed and dropped again was the question of who, exactly, we are informing with these alerts. Government agencies, check. The American public, check. The enemy, check.

Yeah, the enemy.

Think about this for a moment...the vagueness of the alert serves a purpose there, too. It says: We know you're up to something. Now you know that we know.

But they don't know how much we know. It says such without giving away anything specific about what information has reached us. The splodeydopes, or whatever variety of terrorist we're anticipating trouble with, can still change their plans--but now they face a heightened level of security throughout the nation and a wary populace.

This makes very good sense. It makes it harder for an attack to succeed, and ideally it discourages the shitheads from attempting an attack at all.

In the same vein, increasing and decreasing the alert level based on the information that we have also makes good sense. It keeps us from suffering impairment from long periods at a higher alert level, thus helping make the increased vigilance due an increased alert meaningful. It keeps the public from exhaustion and the laxity that can come with a constant state of high alert, when we are prone to quit believing that there's any meaning to it. It gives our emergency personnel much-needed breaks at a lower level when the higher one isn't truly necessary. And it communicates to the enemy that we know enough about them to judge when they are a particular threat and react accordingly.

Intelligence is never 100%. I think, though, that our government is handling the alert levels with skill, foresight, and an eye to communicating what we want to communicate to the enemy. That message to the bad guys is a vital part of the system, and shouldn't be discounted in the consideration of the usefulness of the alerts.

Meanwhile, Rosemary thinks one of the commenters has a pretty good idea.

UPDATE 2145: Andrew has an even more vicious idea. That one would bring the war to an end without a bomb even being dropped, methinks. Heh.

9:40 AM 0 comments
Sunday, December 21, 2003

Since my partner is doing such a bang-up job providing you with that wondrous thing popularly known as "content," I thought I'd break for a little holiday cheer:

"Phrosty the Photon" (sung to "Frosty the Snowman")

Phrosty the Photon was quite a quantum sight,
With a zero mass and an endless life, and a speed approaching
Light.

There must have been some magic in a physics lab one year,
For when they studied X-Ray beams, old Phrosty did appear,
Ooooooh...

Phrosty the Photon says he knows he's not that large,
But he said one day, if he comes this way, he will give us
All a charge.

Thumpity, thump, thump, thumpity, thump, thump,
Moving fast as light.
Thumpity, thump, thump, thumpity, thump, thump,
Phrosty's out of sight.
May all your Christmases be light.

6:47 PM 0 comments
Thursday, December 18, 2003

Despite the continued failure of the promised "content" to materialize, your not-so-humble hosts have already drawn the attention of James, he of Outside the Beltway fame. We appreciate his amusement at our little project more than we suspect he knows.

We would also like to assure Steven that his reaction to our pitiful efforts has not gone unnoticed, and we would like to reassure him that we are laboring to improve his opinion of us. Unfortunately, we are unable at this point in the evening to muster the mental energy to provide the sort of substantial analysis he desires, nay expects, from any blog worthy of mention, but we would like to point out that we agree with this post quite strongly. Appearance is, indeed, not everything.

9:20 PM 0 comments

Heh.

Indeed.

8:50 PM 0 comments
Wednesday, December 17, 2003
2:09 PM 0 comments

In an unexpected (*snork*) development, I have found myself unable to access the template for this site, and thus unable to add Sitemeter and, furthermore, unable to discover exactly how few visitors a site only two and a half hours old can attract.

The worst part is that I would have gotten away with it if it weren't for those darned kids...

1:08 PM 0 comments

This is a test. It is only a test. If this were an actual blog, the post you are viewing would be replaced by what is popularly referred to as "content." Such will be forthcoming with time, and your not-so-humble authors appreciate your patience.

10:33 AM 0 comments